It is a very common advise we keep hearing around us. What does it mean? Just two words, simple meaning but what does that indeed means.
Teacher tells the class, "Think differently".
Manager tells the team, "Think differently".
Mentor tells mentees, "Think differently".
Among the audience, most do agree that they need to think differently but still cannot fathom what it means.
As many people, as many brains, as many personalities. We look different, we dress differently, we eat different. Likewise shouldn't thinking differently be but natural? Doesn't appear so, right? So then are we saying most of us think alike?
The answer is - NO.
Let's take an example. A class is appearing for logical reasoning test with multiple choice(A, B, C & D) question. On every question, the class gets divided into 4 groups(assuming questions are good) based on what option they chose as answer. And with every question we will have different people in different groups. If we increase options to 6, the get class divided into 6 groups. This demonstrates that we all think differently.
If we are already doing it, then what else do we need to do?
Does Think means something different here?
Does Differently means something different here?
To continue with multiple choice example, people choose different options as they think differently. However, to reach to an option approaches may vary. Some may be short/quick. Some may be long/tedious. Some may lead to dead end. Like these questions, we face tasks in LIFE. Many people solve them but one who takes a different approach makes a difference in outcome. Key factors to different thinking are to:
Break all frames of references
During interviews/WhatsApp posts, you might have come across brain teasers which are solved only with unconventional thinking. However, 1 and 2 are intertwined. To be able to think unconventionally you need strong imagination power but in complement you need to be able to forget the past completely. Imagine yourself as first and last person on earth to address problem. If this doesn't happen, unconsciously you will still try to hold on to thinner threads of references from past.
3 is possible after we succeed in 1 and 2. Data Science people may not like it, but data is history and to think future you should stay clear from it.
To conclude, we will see what different thinking can do.
In 1997, Apple was struggling in sales. It was not able to convince and connect people with it's product. IBM was giving them run for their money. That's when it happened, Apple's ad campaign Think Different. It turned out very effective because it actually targeted customer's thought process and made them think differently. And Apple successfully sold what it had and not what customer wanted, desired or even imagined.
Although its not a prerequisite, resource scarcity is the key driver for different thinking. That resource maybe time, money, people or anything. So resourcefulness is a byproduct of thinking differently. It doesn't come naturally to everyone, however, conscious practice with keeping suggested points in mind can help develop the skill.
Let's take smartphones as an example. The most valuable resource of a smartphone is screen space. How effectively and efficiently can you make use of it, decides the success of phone(i.e. hardware) and OS/Apps(i.e. software). Few years back who would have imagined that websites will run on a 3 inch X 6 inch piece of glass and that piece of glass will become our world. But whoever had, they disrupted the industry left, right and center.
There are many examples of innovations we we keep coming across which are result of different thinking. Sometimes complex looking issues has ridiculously simple solutions. So, let's make it a point to think differently and contribute towards a better tomorrow!
There was a time when Human Resource Development(HRD) was important and respected function in all organizations. In recent time it has been observed that organizations are reducing the focus on HRD or treating it as a secondary function.
The use of technology has brought about a revolution in the routine activities of HR. This is mainly triggered by the flourishing IT industry since last 20 years. With primary focus being the development and deliveries of the technical solutions, HR function has been silently subdued by interesting hierarchies in these IT organizations. Firstly HR function has been split into many sub functions like Recruitment Management, Resource Allocation, Training, Appraisals and these functions directly started working with executives and managers in the company. There were certain reasons for that like project managers having the insight to details about required skills on particular project. Although it started like that eventually HR function got sidelined. F…
No personal mailsNo personal phone callsNo personal workNo going out of premises in office hours (i. e. Lock-In) I don’t know where this is going to lead the blue eyed IT industry. Definitely not to the solution of the problems they are trying to address like decreased productivity and quality. The root of these problems lies in how industry culture is developed. Over 25 years, we have messed up industry culture falling prey to many factors. We blindfolded ourselves from reality and foresightedness in the hoopla of growth and increasing profit margins.
We are reaping the results of our shortsightedness. We spoilt our employees with hefty salaries which went on becoming literally filthy as industry flourished and reached to the peak. Companies could easily afford it because it was dollar\pound to rupee conversion. People kept doing same or less amount of work while they kept getting grand increments and bonuses. We lacked the foresight of where this will take us.
We always have the tendency to be selective in interpreting the things so that we can create a bias which in turn help add weight-age to our opinion. It is not a good practice rather it is a kind of manipulation. Of course a knowledgeable reader will notice the bias and will not take it at face value however many people who don't give enough thought or don't have time to do that will fall for it.
Let's take this quote:
"Don’t come to me with problems, come with solutions."
There are loads of articles mainly disagreeing with quote and trying to portray that since they disagree with the quote they are better in the leader fraternity.
First of all the above statement is part of a dialogue and not a quote. This has to have a prologue and a situation. Hence no one can judge a person just because he or she uses this sentence with subordinates. We should not necessarily imagine the quote coming from a frowning manager who is trying to run away from responsibilities. Everyon…